A Semantics for Logics of Preference Based on Possibility Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, we study the semantics for the logics of preference based on possibility theory. Possibility distributions representing the preference between worlds are associated with the possible world models for dynamic logics. Then the preference between actions are determined by comparing some measures of their consequences. We will define different logics of preference by considering the comparisons of possibility measures and guaranteed possibility measures. Some properties of the proposed logics will be studied and their relationships with deontic logics will also be considered.
منابع مشابه
On the possibility theory-based semantics for logics of preference
In this paper, we study the semantics for the logics of preference based on possibility theory. Possibility distributions representing the preference between worlds are associated with the possible world models for dynamic logics. Then the preference between actions are determined by comparing some measures of their consequences. We define different logics of preference by considering the compa...
متن کاملA duality between LM-fuzzy possibility computations and their logical semantics
Let X be a dcpo and let L be a complete lattice. The family σL(X) of all Scott continuous mappings from X to L is a complete lattice under pointwise order, we call it the L-fuzzy Scott structure on X. Let E be a dcpo. A mapping g : σL(E) −> M is called an LM-fuzzy possibility valuation of E if it preserves arbitrary unions. Denote by πLM(E) the set of all LM-fuzzy possibility valuations of E. T...
متن کاملTruth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملProviders and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
In their 2017 article, Mannion and Exworthy provide a thoughtful and theory-based analysis of two parallel trends in modern healthcare systems and their competing and conflicting logics: standardization and customization. This commentary further discusses the challenge of treatment decision-making in times of evidence-based medicine (EBM), shared decision-making and personalized medicine. From ...
متن کاملPossibilistic Residuated Implication Logics and Applications
In this paper, we will develop a class of logics for reasoning about qualitative and quantitative uncertainty. The semantics of the logics is uniformly based on possibility theory. Each logic in the class is parameterized by a t-norm operation on 0,1], and we express the degree of implication between the possibilities of two formulas explicitly by using residuated implication with respect to th...
متن کامل